Would u? Could u?
 

To the general public to see how much society is effecting us & how "open minded" us thinkers really are... Truthfully, would u ever consider a relationship (romantic) with a member of the same sex?

... Share Wit' Us:D

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Hell No:o!!! Ukh!! Ye3!! Yuck!! L3ama!!!

No Way Dude:o
Disgusting!!

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

I would rather cut my genitals off

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

justin be7yet rabbak men wen bet sir tjiboun?
in english, from where the hell do u come up with such questions:S?
HELL NO...
and if this question is the scale that would make me closed-minded or not, then i'm proud to be tightly locked minded!

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

whose da 1 who voted by he had already had several:p
AKEEED NO!!!

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

WTF:O:O

akiid no:D:D...it's disgusting:S tfeh...

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

HELL NOO i mean who in their right mind would do such a thing the people who do it could be mental :S:S:S and as medusa said: "...God created a woman and a man..." not two of the same sex :S:S jeesh

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

hell no!
It's not the society effect on me but it's just disgusting...

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

LOL...lt is not something you consider....As systamatics said, come out whoever voted several times, it's alright :p

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

well if i was gay akid i will consider a relation of the same but im not, so for me a relation with the same isnt attractive or requested by me, i seek relations with other sexe so sure ill tell no i wot consider a relation with the same sex
i didnt vote cuz there is not an option for straight enno u have to add an answer " im straight"

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

hell no !!!! i voted the first one cause i thought the question was:would you concider a relation ship with a sex partner :S :$ :P cause many people have felt in love after a sex relation :P but akid not of the same sex +o(

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

ya meskin ya Justin ... 2amit 2yemiton 3aleik :p

I think Justin wasn't suggesting that you become gay or lesbian and his question i think was something related to what Freud had said long time ago ...

Because according to Freud bisexuality was a normal part of development, eno all of us went through a period of bisexuality and in the end most of us came out heterosexual but that the bisexual phase we traversed remained on some unconscious level, and was dealt with in other ways....He did not consider it something that should be criminalized, or penalized ...

ya3ne kel wa7ad fina mara2 aw la7 yemro2 bi mar7alit bisexuality, w bil e5ir la7 yotla3 minna (most of the time) heterosexual w el homosexual phase la7 tdal bil unconscious level and we won't be aware of it and we'll deny it ...

that's Freud and other psychiatrists analysis, i don't know how much it's true ... but i take it into consideration

returning to the original question ... my answer is definitely a big NO :p

Thank You ...

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

maybe, only if the conditions were right,
I m not gay nor bi so basically why would i do such thing if i have no attraction to the same sex?

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

being bisexual doesn't mean you have to be attracted to both sexes equally ... if you are a male you could be attracted to females in let's say 95% of case and to males in 5% and still you'll be bisexual w fi ykoun el 3akss kamena ...

a bisexual could be also a passive or active :
Passively bi, aka open-minded, is a non-sex specific term that describes a heterosexual/bi-curious person who is open to incidental or direct contact (typically in a group sex scenario) from a member of the same sex .
or a homosexual/bi-curious person who is open to contact with members of the opposite sex under the same scenario, which usually doesn't involve reciprocation.

Actively bi is a non-sex specific term that can describe a bi-curious person who initiates direct contact with the sex opposite his or her usual identity (either hetero- or homosexual); it can also refer to a bisexual person who engages in contact with members of both sexes on a fairly regular basis.

Thank You ...

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

To the general public to see how much society is effecting us & how "open minded" us thinkers really are... Truthfully, would u ever consider a relationship (romantic) with a member of the same sex?

So any new answers?:D

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

No, in my view homosexuality is wrong, you are not born gay.

Resent studies have shown that the reason some people are attracted to the same sex is because of a halt of development in certain areas in the brain(this happens to most people but not always in the same area of the brain). When you are about 9 or 10 years and your body is starting to develop sexual interest you get a little bit "scared" of the whole thing since you are not on "familiar ground". You start to move away from the opposite sex(boys say "ueeww, girls" and girs go (yukk, boys), if something traumatic happens in your life in that time your a part brain might stopp developing which causes you to stay in that particular area. Which causes different sexual attractions when you grow up.

This kind of thing happens alot in defferent areas of the brain to, these thing can usually be cured, so why don't not reaserch if homosexuality can be cured?

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

My friend, they have been trying to cure gay people since hundred of years, homosexuality is not kind of sickness, the number of homosexual people in every society is high enough to prove that such thing is a reality and pushed the united nations to adopt gay rights among human rights and switched from "sickness" to "rights".

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Sickness can be divided into three things:
1. Disease
2. Illness
3. Disorder

Each of these has it's own way of being cured.
With what I described, Homosexuality would fall under disorder.

They were trying to cure homosexuals without knowing the cause of homosexuality, that's why it was impossible. These studies that I mentioned earlier are very new, they are currently the only ones that show the cause of homosexuality, therefor the UN couldn't have had much to go with if they wanted to brand it as a sickness.

Also, I doubt countries who accept Homosexuality will start thinking things over now.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

hello no
bass:wtf: we wont 2 know who voted iv already had several??:|

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Hellllllllllllllllllllll NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Omg Thts Soo Yuck !

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Teb since you think they found the reasons now and know how to "cure" homosexual people to turn heterosexual then why don't they apply it and withdraw their rights?
Systems are accepting gay rights one after another and someday they will be adopted by all systems.
as everything in this world, things improve on all levels and changing the identification of homosexuality from sickness to rights was not an accident.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

I never said that they found a cure, they found the cause of it, which makes research for a cure possible.

We all know how much western countries fear not being politically correct, no one ever speaks against something like this in public, if they do the media will portray them as intolerant racists but whenever there is an anonymous poll about homosexuality you will see that, while not a majority, many are against homosexuality(a rough average of 40%).


One more thing, you keep saying it's not a sickness, why? where is your proof?

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

First of all, I was speaking from a scientific point of view.
Second of all, I didn't say it created more STD cases that a heterosexual relationship.

Third of all, the "Evangelical" scientist that I was talking about was actually a religion hating atheist.
Also, he spent quite a time studying human behavior, a decade or two if I remember right.

Each person has the right to have his say on what kind of society he wants to live in.
Each person votes, then the votes are counted, then who ever the majority turns out to be, it gets its way. That is democracy.
If most of the most Lebanese say they don't want homosexual activity in their country there should be none.

But the thing is that every country has its own taboos. There is always a subject that you just can't talk about in a bad way.
In Lebanon you can't say anything bad about religion, in the US you can't say anything bad about the Jews, in the rest of the west you can't say anything bad about the gay.
You can see this as a problem if you want, I see it as a good way of preserving your traditions. If you don't like the countries taboos go some place else.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

lol, the majority can forbid gay rights but they cannot forbid homosexuality. it existed, exist, and will always exist and this community will accept it sooner or later. we all pass by the same point. decades ago women used to be seen inferior to men but things improved and they got their rights of voting and being very effective in their environment other than being for bed and cleaning.
lol aya taboo aya traditions man, no one has the right to judge anyone according to his race,religion,believes or sexual orientation. we all born equal and die equal. if those are not being applied in Lebanon "yet" it doesn't mean it's correct and throw it on traditions that 90% are based on religious beliefs.
lol, can you prove the opposite? ;)

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Goddammit, will you please, for once, start reading my post thoroughly! :Tawa:
I said homosexual activity, they can forbid that.

1. One isn't born gay.
2. Just because they are based on religious beliefs doesn't mean they have to be abandoned.

Read my previous post:
Now it's your turn to give evidence showing that it's not.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

no for sure......but i don't have anything against homosexuals........

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

ew, watch your language dude!
"homosexual activity" is a gay right smarty.
no one said the opposite, don't steal is something in religion still it's something good and right. but in some countries driving cars is a sin for women...
The point is that most of the forbidding rights are based on religious beliefs.
i already got my answer ;)

homosexuality exists even among animals, now tell me they're psycho lol. anyway refer to the end of my first posts you'll get your answer ;)

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Yet again, you failed to read the posts properly .
You said: "the majority can forbid gay rights but they cannot forbid homosexuality".
I said: "I said homosexual activity, they can forbid that".

Ergo: We both agree that the majority can forbid "Gay Rights"/"Homosexual activity" but not "homosexuality itself".

True, but my stand against homosexuality isn't based on my religious beliefs.
Also, whether you like it or not, in a democratic country, the majority decides, it doesn't matter why they are making a choice, be it of religious or personal reasons, they decide.

And some animals pee on each other in order to make their relationship stronger, but we are not animals, are we?

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

what's the point if you can forbid their rights but do not find a "solution" for it?
besides, you think putting people in jail and torturing them is something that meets with your liberal and freedom beliefs?
so far they're all (liberal systems) ending up by adopting such rights, trust me we won't be an exception, people who created democracy are way ahead of us and check what do they think about this matter. we have half democracy in lebanon, what democracy is that when it's based on religious basis.
Animals do eat, sleep, run, have sex... we have too many things in common, homosexuality is one of them :)
it's reality just like you have attraction to the opposite sex, those people were born with an attraction to the same sex. it's the problem of this world, everything takes time to happen. the world have seen racism based on religion, race, gender and now homosexuality. they all end up the same way.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

The solution isn't torture or jail, it's mental help. Beating them up won't change their mind.

If the majority is religious and want it this way, then it's a good democracy.

You still haven't given me any evidence that a human can be born gay...

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

So, how are you going to prevent them from homosexual activities otherwise?
it's something but believe me it's not democracy, when you want to live in a democratic country you learn that all people are equal in dues and rights regardless of their race,beliefs,gender we took these in 11eme it's the main basis of the human rights we signed proudly and being adopted by every democratic country. and so far racism is still at its best in Lebanon seeing the poor Africans working in houses as slaves, religious system which qualify the person according to his religion... the problem in this country is that we talk about freedom but we don't know what does it mean.
I did give an evidence but you simply ignored it.
We have too many things in common with animals we have the same needs to survive and please don't come up with your "peeing" theory lol it's just too weak.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

Mental help, I said it in the previous post.
Also, just because you are attracted to something doesn't mean you have to have sex with it. Some people are attracted to animals, is that a society you want to live in, one where people F*ck everything they see when they get horny?

No, pure democracy is the government doing what the majority of the people want.

Ohhh animals, yes do that, compare us humans to those way inferior creatures.

I searched the net for about a half hour, looking for a place proving that animals can fall in love like we do, there is none, I suggest you do the same when trying to make a point.

Re: Would u? Could u?
 

stop drifting the topic away and trying to compare homosexuality to animals peeing on each others and now people having sex with animals, increase the value of your posts.
Yes by the majority of the people that are all equal in dues and rights regardless of their beliefs, race, gender. you're just repeating yourself again and over again just for the sake of saying something.
lol your superiority is your problem. you see things as you want not as they are. if you believe that we have nothing in common with animals you got issues with reality.
Are you trying to prove something? why would i care if animals fall in love or not? i am telling you that we have too many things in common with other creatures. i am not creating anything new. you're just ignoring reality that human have sex and animals have sex, animals eat and humans eat, some animals are gay some humans are gay, some animals are straight some humans are straight. never thought i would reach this level of explaining.
However i m out of this. this discussion lost its value.