|
Lady Gaga: Insane person
ليدي غاغا ترتدي فستاناً من اللحم في حفل "أم.تي.في" :003: :hizb: :wtf: |
lets hope a celeb bring his\her dog with him\her
|
... definitely the biggest attention wh*re in the universe right now.
|
Where is PETA when you need them?
|
she is a sick minded person
|
I'm more a fan of clothe made of vegetables :p
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5979/vegetariansr.jpg now that's hot |
Quote:
|
the sad thing is that alot of people finds this cool and find her sexy , and find her as like somethin outstanding , while really , shes an attention who*e
|
Quote:
|
i admire her art, but didn't she stink in that?
|
We're getting a Lady Gaga for barbecue today (Sunday), who's in?
|
shes insanely Disgusting...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
some of her songs are nice, even if she dresses in human skin, we still have to admit that
|
Quote:
listen to pink floyd , youll know what art is |
dude who sent you?
|
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyy I heard Pink Floyd :ang: lol u can't compare Pink Floyd to anyone in the world, there's good and there's ingenious
ya3ne bl 3arabe l mchabra7 fi Pink Floyd and there's . . . . . . . . . . Others so plz focus ur "debate" on good and bad instead of heading to Pink Floyd cz no1 is even close to them :huh: anyways I find her songs good [in her genre of music] but still, i'm not a fan of such music, bas again..in her genre, she's good. |
Quote:
Bad Romance is one of the best songs, Lady Gaga's music is EPIC WIN, she is an artist - just because you heard one song for her it doesn't give you the privilege to judge her. For me, I find Lady Gaga stylish, she has her own style, she is bold! Everything she made so far is just unique, even this meat dress thing is unique, but I gotta admit it is seriously disgusting :Tawa: |
Quote:
if you consider her stylish and unique , you know nothing about those . Pink floyd?? brought them up to show you what 'REAL' art is and what wanna be artists are. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sorry Systa, your intelligence and taste are superior to all of ours... NOT!!! |
well to be fair artists have always had their special style, take Kiss for example; they're one of the best artists of all time but they've got their style aswell, SlipKnot got their style aswell with the masks and such, alot of good artists got a special something..Lady Gaga [again, in her genre of music] is a very good artist, me not liking her style of music [I dnt hate it, but I dnt love it] doesn't mean she's not good, that's all that there is to it :)
|
she's one of the best at the shittiest music genre. I'll give her that.
Still I would not mind skulllcrushing her and making a necklace for me out of the parts. Would be a nice "style", my own, if you know what I mean. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Everyone adequate is tired of her and things like she. I don't find why some one can like that "art" and even call it so. Those are just insulting Art.
|
Quote:
For crying out loud, think before you post. |
To you who like Gaga, ask yourself one question.
How famous would she have been if her fame relied only on her music*? *That means not her body (which is kind of crap if you ask me), not her cloths (which are also crap if you ask me) and not her behavior (which is...well, you get the point). I remember seeing a video clip of her singing a song before she became famous. She was wearing normal cloths and not a bikini made of woolly mammoth fur, she was singing with her own voice without the help of a computer and she was pretty good. But could she have become famous like that? And art is one of those things that each person has a different idea of what it is. One time a saw (on TV) an "artist" pissing in a cup in public and drinking it. Why? Because according to him, it was art. Gaga is that kind of artist, it's just that she takes a shortcut and pisses directly out of her mouth. |
i'm the kind of person who doesn't watch TV, i loved her songs when i heard them on the radio and before watching their videos on youtube (and some videos are gross). the thing is, she drew a lot of attention because of being odd, now she can continue without all this fuss, but she wouldn't because this is what made her.
i once watched an interview with her (by Oprah), and she seemed a very nice person, maybe just eccentric from the outside. |
Quote:
Although I agree about the music. People who like that music might love her before they see her. I actually think she would have been successful too without doing all that, but her actions and character drew more attention from all over. Like me, I only tried to know about her not because I wanted to listen to her music but because of her controversial actions and all. But trust me it took time ... I didn't know she was a non-fictional character until recently. |
Who gives a shit?! her music is awesome and that's what matters.
|
...Oh YeAh sHe aLsO writEs Her OwN MuSiC OmgZZZZZZ LOVEEE !!!<3
Her music is still nevertheless gay. Plus imagine that first you did listen to the music and liked it and then you discovered Lady Gaga was an ugly old wrinkled grandma. Your opinion might change drastically. A suddenly cool song and singer and all will become ..a333 http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kx...00zno1_500.jpg PPPOKER FACEEEE MMMMMUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM |
Whoever likes that sh*t is a part of the crowd , the blind crowd who are told what to love and what not to love , be a part of the system.
|
Hahaha Systamatics, you are epic man.
I know this is just your opinion, but one sure thing is that your opinion is as usual hilarious lool |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Systamatic, now in a mental clinic near you. |
Quote:
Let's stick to the topic again please? :D |
Why It's Time to Stop Paying Attention to Lady Gaga
I tried avoiding writing about Lady Gaga for a really long time. Wasn't interested. She's just a disposable pop singer with no observable talent, like most disposable pop singers. But I can't avoid her anymore, because she's everywhere. Wherever I turn, there's Gaga. On TV, in magazines, at all of those Lady Gaga concerts I attend, even on the Internet. Earlier this week, every social networking site was buzzing because of the controversy stirred up by her latest outfit: Representatives of PETA were furious at her attempt to sexualize the murder of animals, parents with young children were outraged at her risky behavior and diehard fans of both meat and naked chicks were heartbroken at her flagrant disregard for both appetites and erections. And that's when I realized that I needed to say something. She's still all over the news even though she's well beyond the Sell By date of a typical pop star, and it has nothing to do with her singing abilities. Everyone's talking about what a "brilliant artist" she is, like a Warhol-esque genius. And either I'm a crazy person, or someone has to stop this nonsense. Someone needs to go and fly out to whatever space brothel she operates out of and say, "That's enough, Lady Gaga." But my rocket doesn't reach psychedelic tramp-funk levels, so I can't personally talk to Gaga. Instead, I'll just write about how she's not any of the things every magazine, critic and entertainment show tries to convince me she is. She's Not Some Free-Spirited Performance Artist While most rationally-thinking people rarely celebrate Gaga's skills as a musician, plenty of music critics and other socially awkward white people who are bad at having opinions will agree on one thing: Lady Gaga is an artist who isn't afraid to be a freak. She went on Oprah and said "the message of Gaga is 'be yourself.'" She doesn't fit into any mold. She's a crazy free spirit. She won't conform to any existing pop standards. Additional meaningless originality platitude. That certainly sounds like it's referring to some kind of genre-bending, authentic artist. The problem is none of it applies to Lady Gaga. WATCH THIS VIDEO HERE YOU WILL BE SHOCKED http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM51q...ayer_embedded#! http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleim...gaga/gaga2.jpg Former roommates have said that there was "nothing that would tip you off that she had this Warhol-esque, 'new art' extremism," she was just a regular chick. Watch the video, if for no other reason than to see the Talent Show host's odd reaction.She looked like this. And she played piano, not some kind of electricity-shooting stage volcano. "Wow" is right, Worst Emcee on the Planet, wow indeed. She's not awful and, even more surprisingly, not at all annoying. She's just like a less refined, less smoky Norah Jones mixed with, like, if Christina Aguiliera had a little sister that was never given voice lessons. If Stefani had continued performing as a person and not a spiky, pale freakstronaut, in an alternate universe, I could really see myself passively tolerating her music for the sake of appeasing a girlfriend. But, Stefani realized that the "Soulful Chick Songwriter Market" was tapped, so she decided to go an alternate route (the "Shrieking Shemale Star-Goblin Market"). When it was clear that she wasn't going to be selling out any tours as a songstress, she very carefully crafted a persona that was deliberately designed to drive as much attention towards herself as possible. There was a moment where she decided "This act won't sell. Let's come up with one that does." Her whole authentic, artistic character was decided by committee in a marketing meeting. Maybe she's smarter than everyone else who is struggling to break into the music industry. She saw how completely retarded pop culture was and decided to embrace it. She found out what was going to attract attention and exploited it to turn into a star, in a celebrity-by-numbers sort of way. As a businesswoman, she is incredibly shrewd--the amount of magazine covers, awards and nominations she's gotten in the past year alone is staggering. But she's not an artist, she's a product. She's Not a Fashion Icon Lady Gaga's look varies from day to day, concert to concert, magazine cover to magazine cover; so it's tough to pinpoint what, exactly, her place in the fashion world is. Her costumes, always surprising and Avant Garde, range in style from the bizarre and controversial Bladerunner Nightmare Chic... ... to this slightly more conservative Transvestite Clown Hooker affair. Regardless of which interplanetary spirit frog she channels when she dresses herself, we can be assured that whatever pop-steampunk-Bowie assortment of top hats and lasers she pulls from her closet menagerie of horrors will be uniquely awful in frightening new ways. Her insane looks are inspiring actual fashion designers in real life who are creating outfits meant to mirror her style. Expect to see hundreds of thousands of little girls wearing bejeweled-monocles and scorpion launching bras roaming the streets this Halloween, and my night terrors every other evening or so. Now, full disclosure: I wear one of three pairs of torn jeans and a probably-stained white T-shirt to work every single day and have since I was hired. I know as much about fashion as I do about getting mustard stains out of white T-shirts which, as you can probably guess, is very little. I showed up to the office with shoes that didn't match. For 11 straight days. One of them was a flip flop and the other was a woman's hat. I know nothing about fashion, is my point, which is why I'm uniquely qualified to talk about Lady Gaga's wardrobe choices, because she doesn't either. I'd call Lady Gaga a monster for ruining a treasured childhood icon if I didn't secretly think that the above picture might actually be of John Denver. The secret of Lady Gaga's fashion isn't difficult to understand: Take something that is traditionally accepted as erotic (leather, nudity, piles of uncooked meat), re-contextualize it by stripping it of anything that reminds anyone of sex (what is known in the fashion world as a "Boner Jihad"), and then top it all off with a hairstyle that says "I'd appreciate it if you didn't look at my face." So, take something that you would normally find agreeable, like a short sundress, remove anything remotely sexual about it by loading it with wires, or balloons, or Lady Gaga's torso, and then wear a hat that, if used properly, could blind anyone unlucky enough to be within a five-foot radius. Or, take a silk nightgown, de-eroticize it by covering your exposed skin in gobs of glitter-sweat, and top it off with two mini helicopter pads designed to attract tiny mouse brides. If you have enough eye shadow to give off the impression that you're an adventurous prostitute who only caters to raccoons, well that's just gravy. She's Not Original Lady Gaga's originality seems to be her only selling point among even people who hate everything about her. They look at her and say, "Well, at least there's no one else out there just like her," like a parent struggling to find a compliment for their least favorite child. Whenever some entertainment news show covers her, they invariably say something along the lines of: "Love her or hate her, you have to admit that she's a totally unique icon! Coming up after the break, we check in with superstar Lou Bega! Here's hoping he gives us a high (mambo number) five!" But, of course, she isn't unique in any way. She is exactly one part Madonna and one part Marilyn Manson. She looked at two people who received massive amounts of attention--Madonna for being hyper sexualized and scandalous, and Manson for being aggressively controversial--and instead of saying, "Let me come up with something new in that same family of publicity," said, "I'll just do both of those things, all the time." Madonna's whole kick was being ultra sexual, talking openly about her multiple sexual partners of varying genders. Not when anyone asked, or anything like that, she just did it all the time. Especially in her early career, she would link every conversation back to something insanely sexual and forward. "Well the interesting thing about my new album is I WILL **** YOU RIGHT NOW, DAVID LETTERMAN. LOOK AT ME!" Manson, on the other end of the spectrum, would just try to be as theatrically scary and controversial as possible. He'd use blood in his act, he'd cut himself, he'd talk about what an outcast he was. "Society doesn't accept me because I'm too IN YOUR FACE. LOOK AT ME!" Madonna took teenage girls who wanted to piss off their dads and Manson took teenage boys who wanted to piss off the football team and they built little armies. Armies that would go on to buy millions of records. So, you take this: And throw in a dash of this: And it's really no surprise that you get this: http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleim...aga/gaga12.jpgI think this is Lady Gaga. Man, who the **** knows anymore, that could be the dude from The Strokes. It's that same publicity-machine mentality that informs everything that Gaga does. "Here are two things that people got famous for. If I do both of those things louder, faster and with more frequency than anyone else, the world will look at me under the assumption that what I'm doing must be interesting."But she's not. She's the kid who ate worms at lunch because, "Hey, at least people are looking at me." And now the whole world watches what she does. People who actively avoid pop music have heard of her. She was one of Time Magazine's Most Influential People. She's tricked everyone into believing she's some creative genius, and she's just going to keep doing weird, pointless, nonsense bullshit until she's dethroned by the next incarnation of Lady Gaga, some little boy or girl who is at this moment quietly learning all of Gaga's lessons for their own cartoonish version of pop stardom. She's doing it all while A) making loads of money and B) dressed like a cracked-out Wookiee-poacher at a Rod Stewart lookalike contest. http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleim...aga/gaga14.jpgYep, that is exactly what that is. I weep for the future.Read more: http://www.cracked.com/blog/why-its-time-to-stop-paying-attention-to-lady-gaga/#ixzz10wrtPK4A |
she might be doing that because she's ugly to be honest. I mean seriously if you usually see such girl will you say she's hot ?, you might not want to look at her even, but now she is one of the most desired girls , she knew she was ugly and all this controversy she has has made her more sexy in some way. I mean even in that meat thing, she might be trying to make some people think about undressing her and f*cking her. I am sure she has that in her mind in the first place when she wears such thing. Just like some people hide their "ugliness" by trying to make plastic surgery or fixing their hair or whatever, she is taking it to another level , .... all that only to make young men like you think of f*cking her. I am sure some people here probably reached a point where they would prefer to do her instead of some more " common beauties" that usually are 100 times more sexually desirable.
To me that is interesting. First thing that made me think this way is that she never tries anymore to wear normal things or look even 1% normal. She tries to have the weirdest looks ever so that you will never look at her as an ugly girl but as a weird girl which is totally different because ugly girls are just ugly no matter what but weird girls "can" be hiding some beauty and she wants to delude us to think she's beautiful. And she is doing that just great. I'm not trying to judge her ofcourse but everything she does comes from an inferiority complex. Still all people are attention wh*re to some extent, but she's smart enough to succeed in grabbing the attention. It's not fair anyway that some people are born more "beautiful" than others so she found a way to balance it herself. |
Here what I think. Do I like what she's wearing sure not it's disgusting! But do I find it creative YES! I mean who thought of wearing "meat" before? I call this being smart to keep getting attention! Her style/fashion the key of her being famous. So whether we like her or not we can't deny that this woman is smart and knows what she's doing. Nothing wrong with having a creative imagination!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger