[Google]

Originally Posted by xcoder

Roudy and "Google", the comparison between twitter and google is useless that's why i used the watch / apple example since each has different functionality, then showed "Google" that twitter beats google in real time feeds since it has a different job.

I still don't understand why he "Google" compared them in the first place.

Originally Posted by Jean

I don't know why you compare Twitter to Google and Facebook, there's a huge difference between them. I use twitter in the company i work for, we promote our products there, and it's just great. Millions of people around the world use twitter for business purposes, except in Lebanon where they think twitter is a "complicated" thing, while it's just simple, easy and powerful.

If you like google and facebook (almost everyone do), i don't see why you should hate Twitter. eno guys, get out of the typical Lebanese mentality, this is not Carlos Eddeh-Emile Rahme war.

Originally Posted by Tawa

Google is a search engine.

Facebook is an internet social network.

Twitter if a complicated form of RSS Feed.

You can't compare any of the three together.
It's like saying, I love food more than bicycles.

I just made xcoder and Jean's idea very simple.

Well, gentlemen, We can compare Google to Twitter but the problem is that you don't understand the point.
The whole thread here is about Twitter's DNS records being compromised and everybody knows that twitter has been hacked many times and DDOSed also... So yes, I'm comparing Google to Twitter. Twitter is an ant compared to Google. I'm not comparing here the functionality of the two, I'm comparing the power in terms of network and security... Understand now?

And I didn't even mention that I'm against Twitter.
I have a Twitter account, but I have no followers and I'm not following anyone, so what now?