Man rapes his 8 day-old baby

[xcoder]

Originally Posted by SysTaMatIcS

According to a police report, officers were called to the Forrest City Medical Center, September 1, 2008, about a baby that had been sexually assaulted. Forrest City police say the baby also had a skull fracture and had to be transferred to the Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock because of the severity of the injuries.

Investigators say the father attacked the infant during a visit at her 15 year-old mother's house. Police say other people were at the home at the time of the assault.

Police say Davis had no criminal record since turning 18, but could not say whether Davis had a juvy wrap-sheet. The information could not be released under Arkansas state law, said investigators.

Police say the infant’s father, 18 year-old Reginald Davis, has been charged with Rape and Second-Degree Battery. The case is still under investigation and it is unknown if any other arrests will be made, said Forrest City Police.

Davis is being held on a $100,000 bond and is scheduled to appear in circuit court on September 17.

halla2 byeego ta3oon l gay rights w they tell us , its how god created him , have u ever heard of freedom?? he loves little babies , stop being babysexphobic

You are a total retard! such post deserves such reply.
Maybe a heterosexual guy who does such thing to an 8 days old is a normal person. Go get a life for god sakes. This is pedophile and sickness. Stop bothering people with your ignorance.

[Bambina]

Originally Posted by abousoun

According to a study made in April 2002 ... The majority of Pedophilic are homosexuals not heterosexual in a ratio of 150.2/19.8

Most fanatic and terrorist organization are Islamic, does it make Islam a terrorist religion?
On the other hand, most rape cases are made by heterosexuals.
So rape and pedophile could not be related to heterosexuality or homosexuality in any way.

[abousoun]

Originally Posted by Bambina

Most fanatic and terrorist organization are Islamic, does it make Islam a terrorist religion?
On the other hand, most rape cases are made by heterosexuals.
So rape and pedophile could not be related to heterosexuality or homosexuality in any way.

I remember at school in math class they used to teach us :
ceci implique =>
equivau a dire <=>
I don't know what's in english since i'm french school educated

the above study shows that most pedophilic are homosexual, they didn't say that most homsexual are pedophilic (ya3ne hayde in one way direction mish in 2 ways direction )
so chou 5ass islam w terrorism w rape w sou3ad hossni ?

Thank You ...

[abousoun]

After reading kain post i noticed that i didn't fully respond

Originally Posted by Bambina

On the other hand, most rape cases are made by heterosexuals.
So rape and pedophile could not be related to heterosexuality or homosexuality in any way.

100% true and that's how homosexuals defend themselves ...
But you are comparing the total number of heterosexuals to the total number of homosexuals and this is something wrong (coz obviously homo are much less than hetero ) ...
However, if you compare the nb of homosexual sex offenders relative to the total nb of homosexuals and the number of heterosexual sex offenders relative to the total nb of heterosexuals ... you'll find that homosexuals are 8 times more to have been arrested for sexual crimes and twice to have been convicted for sexual crimes than heterosexuals ...
(sexual crimes include both rape, pedophilia and others ...)

Thank You ...

[xcoder]

Originally Posted by abousoun

so chou 5ass islam w terrorism w rape w sou3ad hossni ?

Thank You ...

Dude you're using the same logic.
If it doesn't seem logical, neither does the rape - homosexuality relation you're trying to show in this thread.
So if you accept the first theory you would accept the second one because it's also based on facts.
It's not the subject she tried to show but the idea and the logic you're using.

[abousoun]

Originally Posted by xcoder

Dude you're using the same logic.
If it doesn't seem logical, neither does the rape - homosexuality relation you're trying to show in this thread.
So if you accept the first theory you would accept the second one because it's also based on facts.
It's not the subject she tried to show but the idea and the logic you're using.

I understood both of you quite well, but both of you don't seem to understand the subject ... or you are just being too sensitive or defensive when it comes to homosexuals, well i'm not ... go back to my first post in the thread ...

Concerning the second post i talked about pedophilic being mostly homosexuals and how homosexuals promote for it ... these are satistics w analysis i didn't invent them ...
if pedophilic were mostly transgenders i would've search for it and wrote about it ... bass heik se2abit

again i'll say it : pedophilic are mostly homosexuals, but it doesn't mean that homosexuals are pedophilic !!!!!!! try to get this point

Thank You ...

[xcoder]

Originally Posted by abousoun

I understood both of you quite well, but both of you don't seem to understand the subject ... or you are just being too sensitive or defensive when it comes to homosexuals, well i'm not ... go back to my first post in the thread ...

Concerning the second post i talked about pedophilic being mostly homosexuals and how homosexuals promote for it ... these are satistics w analysis i didn't invent them ...
if pedophilic were mostly transgenders i would've search for it and wrote about it ... bass heik se2abit

again i'll say it : pedophilic are mostly homosexuals, but it doesn't mean that homosexuals are pedophilic !!!!!!! try to get this point

Thank You ...

You are so taken by your idea that you don't see other's.
The idea is the relation being made in this thread between rape and homosexuality.
If there wasn't a thread about this subject 2 days ago it wouldn't have been mentioned.
However, try to get the girl's idea also. It's based on statistics. And believe me i accept both facts when it's based on statistics regardless what they are because i m closer to reality.
On the other hand you don't accept both "ideas" mentioned in this thread

[abousoun]

Originally Posted by xcoder

You are so taken by your idea that you don't see other's.
The idea is the relation being made in this thread between rape and homosexuality.
If there wasn't a thread about this subject 2 days ago it wouldn't have been mentioned.
However, try to get the girl's idea also. It's based on statistics. And believe me i accept both facts when it's based on statistics regardless what they are because i m closer to reality.
On the other hand you don't accept both "ideas" mentioned in this thread

okey what are these "ideas" you are both talking about ?
rape and homosexuality ? pedophilic and homosexuality ? islam and terrorism ? heterosexuality and rape ?
but since you mentioned the word "both", then you are meaning only two ... one of them you already said which is "rape and homosexuality" ... the second one i assume it is "isalm and terrorism" or "heterosexual and rape" that i'm not accepting its idea ... anyway i'll got into all of them ...

pedophilia and homosexuality : satistics showed that most pedophilic are homosexuals ... kheir inchalla

Responses i got were :
1 - "most terrorists are islamic in nature, does it make islam a terrorist religion ?"
this would have been a great "contre-example" to my hypothesis, if i concluded earlier that homosexuals are pedophilic ...
ex : if i stated most pedophilic are homosexuals, chefto kif el homosexuals are bunch of criminal pedophilics ... after that i got the above response ... i'll understand it because it will form a good "contre-example", but sadly enough I didn't say it, so this "contre-example" is missplaced here (ya 5ayye from my point of view)

2 - "most rape cases are made by heterosexuals. So rape and pedophile could not be related to heterosexuality or homosexuality in anyway" :
I mentioned with pure satistics (since you accept them) that rape and pedophilia and other sexual crimes are linked to both homosexuals and heterosexuals ... however, studies linked them to one side more than the other side ... what got I do with it ? It's not being taken by any ideas ... it's just stating facts as they are

Thank You ...

[xcoder]

Originally Posted by abousoun

Responses i got were :
1 - "most terrorists are islamic in nature, does it make islam a terrorist religion ?"
this would have been a great "contre-example" to my hypothesis, if i concluded earlier that homosexuals are pedophilic ...
ex : if i stated most pedophilic are homosexuals, chefto kif el homosexuals are bunch of criminal pedophilics ... after that i got the above response ... i'll understand it because it will form a good "contre-example", but sadly enough I didn't say it, so this "contre-example" is missplaced here (ya 5ayye from my point of view)

lol, thanks for proving me right.

Originally Posted by bambina

Most fanatic and terrorist organization are Islamic, does it make Islam a terrorist religion?

Originally Posted by abousoun

On the other hand, most rape cases are made by heterosexuals.
So rape and pedophile could not be related to heterosexuality or homosexuality in any way.

No one said it is terrorist by nature, you understood it that way because you're too sensitive to the Islamic religion
Personally i don't like big part of the Islamic religion but i don't think it's a religion of violence. This is another example based on the first one.
The problem is that the posts were targeting "homosexuality is pedophilia by nature" and statistic attempt to prove that point raised by you.

I am not defending homosexual pedophilia in any meaning, any kind of pedophilia or rape is pure sickness and animal act that could not be justified in any way regardless if it was made by an heterosexual,homosexual,aliens or even by souad hossni.

The idea is that posts were targeting homosexuality and not rape or pedophilia which are totally different subjects.
It is like targeting Islam because of 9/11 incidents for example.

You got the point or you want me to explain it even more?

[abousoun]

Originally Posted by xcoder

lol, thanks for proving me right.

loooooooool man i was quoting bambina ... thank her for proving you are right ... however i just explained earlier to both of you why it's missplaced
btw in the second part you quoted something bambina wrote and put my name instead

Originally Posted by xcoder

No one said it is terrorist by nature, you understood it that way because you're too sensitive to the Islamic religion Personally i don't like big part of the Islamic religion but i don't think it's a religion of violence. This is another example based on the first one.

I didn't discuss that issue because as i mentioned above, it's not even related to the case or the logic in the case ...
if you are interested in it open a thread about it

Originally Posted by xcoder

The problem is that the posts were targeting "homosexuality is pedophilia by nature" and statistic attempt to prove that point raised by you.

Thank you for writing this down ... it couldn't be clearer than this ...
after all the interpretation i gave and all what i said ... you came up with this wrong conclusion which i tried in several time to correct it ...
NOOOOOOOOOO Homosexuality is not pedophilic by nature ... it's the other way around ... Pedophilia is mostly linked to homosexuality
what's so hard to understand in that ?
try to understand this : => and <=> : these aren't the same

Originally Posted by xcoder

I am not defending homosexual pedophilia in any meaning, any kind of pedophilia or rape is pure sickness and animal act that could not be justified in any way regardless if it was made by an heterosexual,homosexual,aliens or even by souad hossni.

I share you the same thing ... except the part of souad hossni

Originally Posted by xcoder

The idea is that posts were targeting homosexuality and not rape or pedophilia which are totally different subjects.
It is like targeting Islam because of 9/11 incidents for example

The ideas were targeting pedophilic nature ... and other posts were showing the linkage between rape, pedophilia, homosexuality or heterosexuality to each other ...

Originally Posted by xcoder

You got the point or you want me to explain it even more?

same here

Thank You ...