Latency VS bandwidth - Page 2

**xcoder** · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by SysTaMatIcS

You mean this

http://www.websitepulse.com/help/tes...ping-test.html

64 bytes from sin01s01-in-f104.google.com (216.239.61.104) icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=154 ms
64 bytes from sin01s01-in-f104.google.com (216.239.61.104) icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=154 ms
64 bytes from sin01s01-in-f104.google.com (216.239.61.104) icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=154 ms
64 bytes from sin01s01-in-f104.google.com (216.239.61.104) icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=153 ms
64 bytes from sin01s01-in-f104.google.com (216.239.61.104) icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=153 ms

that's not you latency man, that's the latency between websitepluse and one of google servers =)

**Google** · 10-13-2009

Low latency is very bad for downloads who have no-resume capability parameter. You might be downloading 300Mb of data and suddenly the download decides to stop when it reaches 90%. What would be your reaction?

**Kingroudy** · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google

Low latency is very bad for downloads who have no-resume capability parameter. You might be downloading 300Mb of data and suddenly the download decides to stop when it reaches 90%. What would be your reaction?

makes no sense... until you prove it.

**Google** · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingroudy

makes no sense... until you prove it.

Does this even need a proof!
Simple. When the connection between the 2 peers takes too long to respond the download session will simply expire.

And by the way, I have high latency and this is what's happening already with most of the downloads of this type.

Kenny5 · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google

Low latency is very bad for downloads who have no-resume capability parameter. You might be downloading 300Mb of data and suddenly the download decides to stop when it reaches 90%. What would be your reaction?

it happened with me while downloading a movie all night long (420 MB) and it stopped at something like 419.99 MB

**Kingroudy** · 10-13-2009

edgard 7abibi, u said low latency in the first post, and then you said high latency, so if you mean high latency, yes, it makes a lot of sense

Neoxter · 10-13-2009

time taken 10 pm:

very hight ping for a 512 dsl which is supposed to b 1mbps after 8pm

also my upload rate is too slow like 1 or 2 kb

**Google** · 10-13-2009

*My bad. Yes I mean high latency!

**xcoder** · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neoxter

time taken 10 pm:

very hight ping for a 512 dsl which is supposed to b 1mbps after 8pm

also my upload rate is too slow like 1 or 2 kb

Hahahaha you killed all my chances to switch to DSL, thank you!

**Google** · 10-13-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neoxter

time taken 10 pm:

very hight ping for a 512 dsl which is supposed to b 1mbps after 8pm

also my upload rate is too slow like 1 or 2 kb

Oh. That's awful!
I know DSL in my region is better than that. Where is this connection established?

10-13-2009	#12
Google Last Online: 05-30-2013 Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,788 Thanks: 10,018 Thanked 1,100 Times in 651 Posts Groans: 1 Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts	Low latency is very bad for downloads who have no-resume capability parameter. You might be downloading 300Mb of data and suddenly the download decides to stop when it reaches 90%. What would be your reaction? __________________

10-13-2009	#16
Kingroudy Super Moderator Last Online: 02-16-2022 Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 5,580 Thanks: 1,888 Thanked 2,653 Times in 1,593 Posts Groans: 55 Groaned at 35 Times in 32 Posts	edgard 7abibi, u said low latency in the first post, and then you said high latency, so if you mean high latency, yes, it makes a lot of sense __________________ click on 'Groan' to switch to my left testicle.

10-13-2009	#17
Neoxter Beyond the Code Last Online: 06-15-2014 Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,993 Thanks: 2,214 Thanked 3,426 Times in 1,499 Posts Groans: 57 Groaned at 69 Times in 52 Posts	time taken 10 pm: very hight ping for a 512 dsl which is supposed to b 1mbps after 8pm also my upload rate is too slow like 1 or 2 kb __________________ Whatever you do, do it for the Lulz.

10-13-2009	#18
Google Last Online: 05-30-2013 Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,788 Thanks: 10,018 Thanked 1,100 Times in 651 Posts Groans: 1 Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts	*My bad. Yes I mean high latency! __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)