الحق باغتصاب الزوجة

[fafooooo]

Sorry mr_j but making us understand your point doesn't need to involve Jesus in the thing w chou kamen in a bad way. Anno that's what Jesus would have done.

I got your point bas there's christians out here mesh kellna atheist.

[mr_j]

I won't alter my speech because people won't like it
I like it, it's my speech, I'll post it.

religion and political opinion are the same to me, they are both decision you take. people are born black, or born white, or born short, I don't offend that, people choose to be fpm or choose to be muslims and christians. religion does not differ from politics and I treat it equaly, nothing will make me change that

[TAREK®]

Originally Posted by fafooooo

Sorry mr_j but making us understand your point doesn't need to involve Jesus in the thing w chou kamen in a bad way. Anno that's what Jesus would have done.

I got your point bas there's christians out here mesh kellna atheist.

wlik why do u have to be so closed minded?

he was being sarcastic, u know how in church they always say, before u act ask yourself " what would jesus do" that's who mr_j was addressing those who build their lives based on this question, he was saying Jesus would not accept this in a sarcastic way, damn it stop being so closed minded and for once think outside the box

[Sogelec]

Originally Posted by TAREK®

wlik why do u have to be so closed minded?

he was being sarcastic, u know how in church they always say, before u act ask yourself " what would jesus do" that's who mr_j was addressing those who build their lives based on this question, he was saying Jesus would not accept this in a sarcastic way, damn it stop being so closed minded and for once think outside the box

listen, atheists are minority, religions believers are majority, we (religion believers) are open minded to accept atheists, so Yeltzmo 7dood l 2adab wl 2osool w ma y2arbo 3al religion. and Mr_j apologized which shows great manners of him, so no need la teje w tefta7 l mawdoo3 and accuse us of being closed minded !!!!!

[Kain]

Originally Posted by TAREK®

wlik why do u have to be so closed minded?

he was being sarcastic, u know how in church they always say, before u act ask yourself " what would jesus do" that's who mr_j was addressing those who build their lives based on this question, he was saying Jesus would not accept this in a sarcastic way, damn it stop being so closed minded and for once think outside the box

Closed minded?
mr_j's point from his remark ( which was not explained until only recently ) aside. Is defending your creed from disrespect being closed minded??

And i suppose there is a reference for determining open and closed mindedness and you are the go-to guy for information on saying who's closed minded and who's not?

Try being a little less condescending eh 3ayne?

[Sogelec]

And back to the subject, i think politics/religion/secular regulations should stay away from the husband and wife problems in bed, we are not in USA, we are Easterns, and such problems are solved between the two, or in the family, i totally understand why FM/HA/ and FPM stood against this law

I have a question, iza your wife 3m t5oonak, w ejet rafa3et da3wa 3aleik eno you are raping her ... kezeb w eftera to get divorce from you, would you then know that this law is wrong?!

[KeXasthur]

Originally Posted by Sogelec

listen, atheists are minority, religions believers are majority,we (religion believers) are open minded to accept atheists, so Yeltzmo 7dood l 2adab wl 2osool w ma y2arbo 3al religion. and Mr_j apologized which shows great manners of him, so no need la teje w tefta7 l mawdoo3 and accuse us of being closed minded !!!!!

كتر خيرك يا شهم


Good though that you united religious people together for once. Good implication in your otherwise banally rhetoric post.

Anyway I do not really believe in absolutely respecting "women's sensitivity" because of various reasons, not saying I don't recognize they exist and I don't care about the matter, but I don't accept it in its given terms especially the way it has been shoved to us by the west. However, don't you realize it is totally incongruous when you accept in a way overriding women's sensitivities for the sake of social benefit, when on the other hand you do not accept overriding religious sensitivities for the sake of the same matter ? ( and in fact I am being slightly unjust towards women because in women sensitivities I mean at some points them being abused physically while in the religious sensitivities, it's a mere insult and more importantly not directed to the person but to a figure outside society)

[SysTaMatIcS]

Originally Posted by Sogelec

And back to the subject, i think politics/religion/secular regulations should stay away from the husband and wife problems in bed, we are not in USA, we are Easterns, and such problems are solved between the two, or in the family, i totally understand why FM/HA/ and FPM stood against this law

I have a question, iza your wife 3m t5oonak, w ejet rafa3et da3wa 3aleik eno you are raping her ... kezeb w eftera to get divorce from you, would you then know that this law is wrong?!

this is irrelevant , there are many ways a wife can get divorce , one of them is claiming your not satisfying her in bed , and it is her right , how about cancelling that ?
btw pamela anderson is doing the role of virgin mary in a series next month

[Sogelec]

Originally Posted by SysTaMatIcS

this is irrelevant , there are many ways a wife can get divorce , one of them is claiming your not satisfying her in bed , and it is her right , how about cancelling that ?
btw pamela anderson is doing the role of virgin mary in a series next month

on the other hand, why give them an extra law to help them divorce?
such laws help in breaking up the eastern society we live in...

[mr_j]

heyk claiming, there is always a proof needed. what if she has a black eye? sorry nothing we can do consult the local priest/sheikh for the divorce

w hidek gets bribed for either side and where is justice?

edit: can we let go of my stupid statement already? it was nothing, it was a moment of anger after reading that article, just forget about it, it's about how the "christian representatives" handled the situation nothing more