Are you with Hizbullah giving up his weapons to the Lebanese Army?

[general3ff]

Are you with Hizbullah giving up his weapons to the Lebanese Army?

When and why in case the answer is yes, and why in case the answer is negative.

[SysTaMatIcS]

ofcourse not....when we can have a capable and strong army , then they should consider it...but right now , its impossible to do that ,it will be like a suicidal thing...its even out of mind to think about it, so the answer is totaly NO

[flamenguita]

I am totally against Hizbullah keeping his arms till no time , but i am not with disarming Hizbullah in the present moment and under these circumstances. Hizbullah should give his arms up when:

1- The Lebanese Army will be capable to defend Lebanon against all aggressions even if it is from the USA itself.

2- Lebanon will be a country for all its citizens and not just for the 14 feb gang who is spreading its militia on the territory.

3- Giving guarentees to Hizbullah that they won't stab him in the back and treat him like some isolated party coz he ain't alone and i hope our agreement with them will go on under all the circumstances.

4- Putting Hizbullah fighters as special squad in the Lebanese Army.

[sayo9394]

i totally agree with Flamenguita...
disarming Hizbullah shouldn't be something of haste... it should be well planned and managed by the Leb Army.

but i'm against making special squad for Hizbullah in the army... that would mean a squad of just shiites, and that doesn't represent the mix of religions in lebanon... they can join the "maghaweer" and some other elite group.

[xcoder]

Of course hizbullah has to deliver its arms to the lebanese army.
The army is the only trusted by all the population and we know also that the relation between the army and the resistance is very strong and stable.
the point is to look how to protect our country in a way to make the army the main responsable of all the lebanese land in another hand we have a powerful resistance that we can't just drop away.
and the arms will be delivered to the army in many steps and make the resistance the army partner by putting plans... since they know the enemy well and the battle field.

[*Bilal*]

Against it, we should not let go our power like this , inno we are today more powerfull:we have the army and our resistance, as long as we are not a country that can defend it self from any agression,then we need both the army and the resistance.

[lebanese_a]

Originally Posted by flamenguita

1- The Lebanese Army will be capable to defend Lebanon against all aggressions even if it is from the USA itself.

I agree we should also train a special squad against an Allien invasion.

[hammerguy]

i voted yes but later ...
i mean when the army becomes allowed to own heavy weapons
(i guess u all know that selling it to our army is prohibited in the west)

Originally Posted by lebanese_a

I agree we should also train a special squad against an Allien invasion.

peace bro
i totally absolutely trully honestly agree with u
and the squad must use the most sophisticated water guns
(i suggest that alliens r vulnerable to water)

[lebanese_a]

Originally Posted by hammerguy

peace bro
i totally absolutely trully honestly agree with u
and the squad must use the most sophisticated water guns
(i suggest that alliens r vulnerable to water)

Yeah bass we'll have to rename them, we can keep "ra3d" bass zelzel will have to be replaced by tsunami eza chi, w if water guns don't work we can throw some politicians at them doghreh byohrbo.

[Crystal Soul]

yes sure i m with hizballa giving up his weapons to the lebanese army but not now later when we receive the 10452km so wen maere3 cheb3a are liberated totay yes they have to give up theur weapons and that what they say so it s written i think in the paper ofta7elof between GMA and SHN