Man rapes his 8 day-old baby

[xcoder]

Originally Posted by abousoun

loooooooool man i was quoting bambina ... thank her for proving you are right ... however i just explained earlier to both of you why it's missplaced
btw in the second part you quoted something bambina wrote and put my name instead

in the first part i bold bambina because it was the base of my opinion but my reply was based on your answer that especially that you denied saying it, yet you did mean it and mention it by revealing the subject and bringing over statistics...
As for the second part you're right :P

I didn't discuss that issue because as i mentioned above, it's not even related to the case or the logic in the case ...
if you are interested in it open a thread about it

The logic is the same my friend, especially with your "<= and <=>" :P
It's like talking about Islam and then someone come over to mention terrorism or the way around backed by statistics that shows that most terrorist organizations are "related" to Islam.

Thank you for writing this down ... it couldn't be clearer than this ...
after all the interpretation i gave and all what i said ... you came up with this wrong conclusion which i tried in several time to correct it ...
NOOOOOOOOOO Homosexuality is not pedophilic by nature ... it's the other way around ... Pedophilia is mostly linked to homosexuality
what's so hard to understand in that ?
try to understand this : => and <=> : these aren't the same

You're still not getting it looool. The point is that you raised the subject for a specific reason. Maybe systa's post gave you the idea by his first genius red highlighted post.

I share you the same thing ... except the part of souad hossni

Btw who is she?

The ideas were targeting pedophilic nature ... and other posts were showing the linkage between rape, pedophilia, homosexuality or heterosexuality to each other ...

If you really believe it, i will believe it 2

same here

Dob lsenak :P

Thank You ...

Ya ahla

[abousoun]

Originally Posted by xcoder

in the first part i bold bambina because it was the base of my opinion but my reply was based on your answer that especially that you denied saying it, yet you did mean it and mention it by revealing the subject and bringing over statistics...

The logic is the same my friend, especially with your "<= and <=>" :P
It's like talking about Islam and then someone come over to mention terrorism or the way around backed by statistics that shows that most terrorist organizations are "related" to Islam.

when you try to make a point against something, and place an example to back you up, this example should be a counter to the original point ... did you see that example denied the fact of the original point ? (the answer is no and it will only be yes, in case i said previsoulsy that the opposite was true as well ... however i didn't )
so it's either was missplaced (so shou 5ass hayde bi hayde) or bambina was backing me up with the article i copied by her example and i missunderstood her motives dt my offensive nature (ma3 eno mish mbayyin she was backing me up )

Originally Posted by xcoder

You're still not getting it looool. The point is that you raised the subject for a specific reason. Maybe systa's post gave you the idea by his first genius red highlighted post.

now you are questionning my motive behind the posts ... go back to my first post in the thread to show you that i wasn't attacking homosexuals

Originally Posted by xcoder

Btw who is she?

she was an actor (RIP)

Originally Posted by xcoder

If you really believe it, i will believe it 2

yes i do and may god be my witness

Originally Posted by xcoder

Dob lsenak :P

okey

Originally Posted by xcoder

Ya ahla

appipi

Thank You ...