|
|
|||||||
| Vcoderz Lobby « Everything and everywhere. » |
| View Poll Results: Does God Exist? | |||
| Yes |
|
44 | 81.48% |
| Sometimes I do other times I dont |
|
1 | 1.85% |
| No |
|
9 | 16.67% |
| Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Share | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#221 |
|
Community Moderator
Last Online: 07-31-2023
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,520
Thanks: 3,023
Thanked 2,076 Times in 1,156 Posts
Groans: 7
Groaned at 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
I will stick to my original rules of not arguing directly if God exists or not
__________________
"Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it. " -Mark Twain |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mr_j For This Useful Post: | Kain (10-09-2009) |
|
|
#222 | |||
|
Last Online: 05-30-2013
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,788
Thanks: 10,018
Thanked 1,100 Times in 651 Posts
Groans: 1
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
These statements are based on the logic mentioned in my previous post. You don't find yourself a material? Then what are you? Casper?!
Quote:
Do you know how is the relation between a god and a slave? A slave will worship and praise his god on his way. But IF the way of belief of this slave and the scriptures he's basing his belief on are not correct 100% DOES NOT mean that his god doesn't exists! Quote:
My God can't be a flower, a mountain, a sea...etc BECAUSE these materials are know by their qualities and what they are capable to do And yes. Not everything happens the way I want. I'm enjoying this. I want nothing. I'm not God. Quote:
Look dude, my job isn't to continue defending the existence of God. We must relax a little bit in this thread and take the other way. no? Don't you see that all these 20 pages of this subject contains an attack of the argument of God's existence while no God_damn argument on why God shouldn't exists! Bas ma bestagreb. 3ade. This subject will always be like this because you people don't have logical arguments. About your invisible tree. 2eza betkhaberne heda 2el mawdou3 I would simply laugh and ask you to pray for it. Yeah I WOULD_LIKE to see some arguments. I'm a new debater in this thread so you can still copy and paste your old arguments here IF you are interested to debate with me. And if you're not. Then you're not. And we simply leave this thread (Since bibattel fi debaters).
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Google For This Useful Post: | Kain (10-09-2009) |
|
|
#223 | |
|
Registered Member
Last Online: 12-17-2012
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,996
Thanks: 319
Thanked 1,119 Times in 872 Posts
Groans: 1
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
About laughing, it's stupid. According to your logic you have no proof. Just because it doesn't serve a massive purpose as that of "God" doesn't mean the idea is laughable. About your arguments ; they are based on assumptions. You assumed that a moved needs a mover (ultimate mover) and assumed God didn't need a mover , etc and above all you assumed that God is the one responsible for it all. And ofcourse the most absurd and illogical assuming God will definitely be that of Religion just for the sole purpose that religion said so. So since you are interested in assigning purposes, so as most religious people who assign purposes for what goes on on earth and why God decides to do them, why don't you assign a purpose for the ultimate beginning ? The beginning of it all ? It is only reasonable that if everything had a purpose because God wanted to, there would be a purpose for the beginning of it all, right ? What shall that ultimate purpose be ? Why would God out of nowhere create the world and Earth and us ? We don't usually ask this question because we think backwards ; in other words, we see ourselves here and we assign a purpose. Common sense and logic says , we see ourselves here and want to assign a purpose, we should go back to the point everything began. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 | |
|
Last Online: 05-30-2013
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,788
Thanks: 10,018
Thanked 1,100 Times in 651 Posts
Groans: 1
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Man. 2at7afetne fe3lan.
You are still repeating yourself again and again so I find no need to quote your words anymore. A moving object can't move by itself. Fi 2awda7 menna hayde. This is not an assumption. This is a fact. Take one of my proof wne2eshne fiya tachouf. And about "God of the religions", I think that I clarified this in the previous post bas 7adertak you don't like to reply to what I say. You just like to quote me and repeat yourself in all all those 20 pages. This tremendous power is God. Search for the word God in the dictionary. Chou 3am nekhtelef 3al tasmiye ya3ne?! God is not a name like my nickname here "Google". God is a fact. God is the ultimate Good. God is the ultimate power. About the purpose you are talking about. Btejile 2ente beddak te7ke 3an 2el purpose! Minak 2ente? w min ana? w min ne7na? Do you want to know the purpose? The purpose was written on a paper and was burnt before you was born in one second. Now go back in time and read the content (If you can understand this then you know what I'm talking about and how I'm describing this purpose). Who's first, the egg or the chicken? God was first. About mentioning that we think backward. Yes, we do. We always ask why things happens but we don't ask why things shouldn't happen. Ya3ne I don't know wen bedde 2ouwsal ma3ak in this debate, But sir, would you please tell us your vision about CREATION? I WOULD_LIKE to read your thoughts about how do you think the world has been created. You said: Quote:
PS: I might leave now. So 2eza tawwalet ta red bikoun just because I'm not here ![]() Bas aslan this discussion will go nowhere and I might at a certain time stop posting for the sake of wasting time.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Google For This Useful Post: | Kain (10-09-2009) |
|
|
#225 | ||||||||
|
Registered Member
Last Online: 12-17-2012
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,996
Thanks: 319
Thanked 1,119 Times in 872 Posts
Groans: 1
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If not ? How do you know that this supernatural power that moved everything and caused everything isn't Zeus and his gang ? Stop acting like a pseudo-intellectual who thinks his Summa Theologica is some sort of brilliant work. It means nothing. At the very most it supports ignorance and states that since we don't know how everything started, some "powerful" thing did that. WOWW How bright is that ?? You can call whatever started everything God. If The Big Bang started everything, you would come and argue it is God. The whole point of mine is that that GOD will mean nothing , absolutely nothing if he is not related to the God of religion. So clarify yourself on this matter first and foremost. Quote:
lol, which means you can call anything that started the world God. Which means God is most likely a mere concept. Quote:
Maybe you are not qualified to answer this question so I will leave it for those who are. Anyway, if you want to understand what I mean here it is: The whole purpose religion puts to us is that everything is centered about us and God does everything to evaluate us, bla bla. Interesting though is that according to religion there once was a nothingness, God was there suddenly and he decided to create the world in order to serve the purpose I stated above. Now that's pure illogical. Why ? Because we weren't even there. We were at the most , if anything, an idea. And even if God wanted to create the world and implement that idea , he would be contradicting himself because initially he wanted to evaluate what existed, but in our case he was creating the problem ( us humans) and then solving it ( evaluating us). It looks like a game not reality. Why would he create a problem to solve it ? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by KeXasthur; 10-09-2009 at 09:10 PM. |
||||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to KeXasthur For This Useful Post: | xcoder (10-10-2009) |
|
|
#226 | |
|
Registered Member
Last Online: 10-14-2022
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,467
Thanks: 14,136
Thanked 4,244 Times in 2,547 Posts
Groans: 186
Groaned at 198 Times in 120 Posts
|
Quote:
, im not talking about religions and the god that we know from the holy books , all im saying is that there is something bigger than us that is behind this creation , nothing came out of nothing , thats wat im talkin abt , i call the thing behind this creation , a GOD , thats the proof i have , its not enough , but is more logical . and makes more sense , weather you deny it or accept it.
__________________
problems of performance appraisal is that it sucks to memorize them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227 | |
|
Registered Member
Last Online: 12-17-2012
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,996
Thanks: 319
Thanked 1,119 Times in 872 Posts
Groans: 1
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
You are saying that since something is very highly unlikely due to being complex (the existence of the universe), then something else must have designed it. However, God must be even more complex from what he created, therefore he must be even more highly unlikely to exist than what he created. Your logic is flawed. Moreover, why don't you tell us why you call that power God ? If the big bang started it all, you would be calling it God, and then if you discovered something else started it all, you will also call it God. On what basis are you defining God in both cases ? On the basis that we exist only ? Because if so, then ofcourse God exists no matter what you say. This is why your logic is very simply saying: 1)God exists, 2)Therefore God exists ! I also urge you to read a book or two about God's existence and arguments about the beginning of the universe. Your arguments and proofs are at the very best assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
Registered Member
Last Online: 10-14-2022
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,467
Thanks: 14,136
Thanked 4,244 Times in 2,547 Posts
Groans: 186
Groaned at 198 Times in 120 Posts
|
Quote:
, im not talking about religions and the god that we know from the holy books , all im saying is that there is something bigger than us that is behind this creation , nothing came out of nothing , thats wat im talkin abt , i call the thing behind this creation , a GOD , thats the proof i have , its not enough , but is more logical . and makes more sense , weather you deny it or accept it.
__________________
problems of performance appraisal is that it sucks to memorize them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
info@sync.com.lb
Last Online: 11-29-2020
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,827
Thanks: 1,348
Thanked 2,391 Times in 1,306 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
Atheist People are Sciences kiddies.
Thank You.
__________________
http://www.gamync.com Lebanese Produced Mobiles Games by http://www.sync.com.lb |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 | ||
|
Community Moderator
Last Online: 07-31-2023
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,520
Thanks: 3,023
Thanked 2,076 Times in 1,156 Posts
Groans: 7
Groaned at 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
and I asked why is it easier to believe that God came out of nothing and did everything, and hard to believe that the universe came out of nothing and end of story Quote:
no it is basic logic do you see it smell it or feel it? no then it is probably not there end of story
__________________
"Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it. " -Mark Twain |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| exist, god |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|
|