Hizboullah's Rights

[moqawem]

Originally Posted by hegma

أكيد لازم ياخد برأي اللبنانية مين ما كانو يكونو، هني لبنانية ولازم يحترم رأين لو كانو عكسنا، ما تنسى بمثلو عالم...
وبرأيي إنو أكيد يحق لحزبالله إنو يرد على مقتل عماد مغنية، بس أكيد لما يتأكد مين يلي أتلو... مش بس هيك لازم الجيش يرد، لئن ولا مرة دولة قتلت حدا من دولة تانية إلا ما صار حرب (الحرب العلميه التانيه وحده منن)

سلام،
لا شكّ ان لدينا شركاء في الوطن، مهما كان حجم تمثيلهم بالنهاية هم شركاء،
لكن يا صاحبي اذا بدنا ناخد رأي كل شخص بالرد ، لن يكون هناك رد اصلا،
المقاومة قائمة على السرية ، وعلى الحذر ، طبيعي مش ح يجي الحزب يقلهم انا بدجي رد واقتل فلان وبالوقت الفلاني،
المقاومة حريصة على البلد واكيد اي رد بدو يأخذ بالحسبان اي وضع ممكن يكون ، لكن بنفس الوقت المقاومة ليست بحاجة الى اجماع ، بحث انّه لا يوجد مقاومة على مر التاريخ حظيت باجماع وطني لا بلبنان ولا بغير لبنان.
وعن التوقيت والطريقة فهما متروكان للمقاومة اذ انّها هي الوحيدة القادرة على درس الوضع والظرف المناسب ،
وبعدين ليه نحنا مستعجلين؟
عدم الرد على اغتيال الحاج عماد بحد ذاته رد على الصهاينة، شو مش شايفينهم مش عم بناموا الليل

[moqawem]

Originally Posted by hegma

badna njarreb ne7terem 7alna bass nred 3a 7ada 3am y3abber 3an ra2yo..
2nd i didn't say that it's not israel behind this assassination but maybe it's not, so why we don't lunch an inquiry to determine who is responsible (se3eta mnet2akkad).. Why we do like 14 march? They say that every attack syria is behind it, and we say that it's israel.. Dakhilkon bala tanabou2et ba2a "mou2amara we7deh fi, ma fi ra2ey!! Enta chou ra2yak?"...
In my point of view if all hezbollah talk like you i will vote to "against ha to respond to hajj imad's assassination ".
But if they are sure that it's israel because of their moukhabarat bikoun sar chi teneh...

سلام خيي ،
انا بأكدلك انّ حزب الله توصل الى نتيجة مفادها ان اسرائيل قامت بهذه العملية.

[Kain]

Originally Posted by hegma

badna njarreb ne7terem 7alna bass nred 3a 7ada 3am y3abber 3an ra2yo..
2nd i didn't say that it's not Israel behind this assassination but MAYBE it's not, so why we don't lunch an inquiry to determine who is responsible (se3eta mnet2akkad).. why we do like 14 march? they say that every attack Syria is behind it, and we say that it's Israel.. dakhilkon bala tanabou2et ba2a "mou2amara we7deh fi, ma fi ra2ey!! enta chou ra2yak?"...
in my point of view if all Hezbollah talk like you i will vote to "against HA to respond to Hajj Imad's assassination ".
but if they are sure that it's israel because of their moukhabarat bikoun sar chi teneh...

shaklak fhemetne ghalat. be7yet lli khala2ak = be7yet Allah...ma ken azde yyeha ka ihene aw shi.

w no we're not doing anything like 14M. The inquiry has already been launched and it has already been determined that the Israelis are after it. The articles were posted a long time ago on vcoderz, an impressive one was the one posted by Noam Chomsky, a jewish political analyst...he's anti-israeli.

Kermel hek i posted that in reply to what you said. La2an ma 3ala 7ad 3elme fi 7ada ba3do bi2ool eno fi 7ada gher Israel khassa bel mawdoo3.

It has already been determined that it was Israeli mossad in cooperation with some intelligence agencies from arabic countries, and a few rogue intelligence agents.

edit:1- Hezbollah ma bye7ko 3al tayer...shoof ni2asheton w la7ez eno kell shi bye7kou byed3amou bi daleel.

2- bel nesbe la "talk like me" kamen ana ma be7ke 3al tayer w eza fi mawdoo3 ma ba3rif shi 3anno ma b2arrib sawbo. But when i see someone talking unjustly about a righteous cause or misinterpreting the reality of the situation i have no choice but to answer.

3- lli 3endo 7ejje aw radd 3alli ana elto yetfaddal. Bas dakhilkon, The last thing we need is a reply with the very same words each and every time. The same answers that they cannot justify and end up talking nonsense lamma nne2eshon fiha just because of the fact that they are blinded by what they're saying and debate in a futile attempt to prove that they can say a word or two. So please spare us.
I don't mean you hegma or anyone who has posted in this thread so far. henne bya3erfo 7alon.

[TAREK®]

Originally Posted by Kain

shaklak fhemetne ghalat. be7yet lli khala2ak = be7yet Allah...ma ken azde yyeha ka ihene aw shi.

w no we're not doing anything like syria. The inquiry has already been launched and it has already been determined that the Israelis are after it. The articles were posted a long time ago on vcoderz, an impressive one was the one posted by Noam Chomsky, a jewish political analyst...he's anti-israeli.

Kermel hek i posted that in reply to what you said. La2an ma 3ala 7ad 3elme fi 7ada ba3do bi2ool eno fi 7ada gher Israel khassa bel mawdoo3.

It has already been determined that it was Israeli mossad in cooperation with some intelligence agencies from arabic countries, and a few rogue intelligence agents.

Adding:

specially that the Israelis lama7o ino heneh li ghtelou aktar men ma enon nafo eno elon id bel ossa

so its clear that those who killed Hajj Imad Moughnyeh are the same people who killed Ghaleb 3awali : El Mossad el esra2ileh

[Kain]

Originally Posted by hegma

bass ana 3am be7keh 3an l manate2 li 100% massi7iyeh welli 70% 3awniyeh metl keserwen, w ana men keserwen.. 2belna aw nakarna lezem ne3teref enno khserna cha3biyeh wmen l asbeb kenet khoutab l sayyed 3an 7 ayyar w akid to7rid l batrak l ta2ifeh..

Lli manno ma3 l sayed khel2a manno ma3 l sayed w ma 7a y7ebbo law shou ma 2al 2amma yalli ma3 l sayed w seme3 l khitab mnee7 bya3rif shou ken azdo l sayed men "7 ayyar yawmon majeed". He explained what he meant in that same speech to avoid being misinterpreted. Khitab l sayed la 2addam w la 2akhar bel nesbe lal entikhabet.

Yes it caused a commotion, but all because 14M took that sentence out of context and made a commotion out of it.

Those who heard the speech and heard that explanation could not possibly misinterpret it, but those who already hated him or did not hear that speech would very easily think that what he said was "nkeye" fihon.

[RUSSIAN]

It's another jewish provocation. They want to start a new war. And the 7izballa should decide reply or not based on their capability of wininng such war.

[Taifoon]

Originally Posted by The Legend Killer

Do You think HA have the right to respond to Hajj Imad's assassination without taking the Lebanese Government's opinion?

why\why not?

Another interesting question would be: If HA decides to retaliate, who should be their target? An Israeli equivalent of Hajj Imad, or someone, anyone, or something else?

In my opinion, the government will never want to know of HAs retaliations plans. You know, the less they know, the more they can claim they are not involved