Iran's Nuclear Program

[RedRoses]

Originally Posted by Patriotic

I don't think that this is an economical issue, since the president is so extremist, i'm affraid that he will lead his country to face big problems with the world community.
Look at the destiny of Saddam Houssein, Bachar Al Assad ... they tried to face the world, but they could not.
He have to learn from them.

By the way, this issue have been going on for the fourth year! Iranians started developing their nuclear resources at the time of Khatami, who is described to be as neutral. It is not due to the election of Ahmadi Najad. Instead, you can say that the Iranians elected Ahamadi Najad as a reaction to the increasing pressures on their country.
Anyway, It is definetly safe to go on just as the world community (USA) commands. But is it correct? Should we waive our rights to please others? Should we compromise in our soverignty? I know the USA does not, why shouldn't we too?

[WiseCookie]

Why do india and pakistan posses weapons when Iran can't ? Just becuase they're threatning the untouchable Israel ? Besides they're not even using it for weapons, and even if they are, maybe then we'll have some axis of power in the region without israel soleley possesing the nukes.

[General]

Originally Posted by WiseCookie

Why do india and pakistan posses weapons when Iran can't ? Just becuase they're threatning the untouchable Israel ? Besides they're not even using it for weapons, and even if they are, maybe then we'll have some axis of power in the region without israel soleley possesing the nukes.

Why USA, Israel and these countries have the right and Iran doesn't?...

[patriotic_girl]

I voteds against...
Iran, india , pakistan, israel, US, france, etc..
nobody should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons

[Patriotic]

Of course no one should be allowed to have its own nuclear program, what if they will go to a war, every side will use his program, and all the world will be a big example to Heroshima.

[RedRoses]

Iran is NOT developing its nuclear weapons!! (seems everybody is convinced with the American propaganda)......anyway
If I accept this proposition then I think it would serve stability rather than instigates war. Keep in mind that a Nuclear nation (the one that has nuclear weapons) would never STRIKE another nuclear nation!

[Patriotic]

We are in the year 2006, i don't think that we have to go to a new war...


Give peace its chance.

[RedRoses]

I totally agree with you PATRIOTIC

Look at the Paksitani-Indian example, things turned out fine when both countries were able to balance their powers.
When India had its nuclear weapons and Pakistan did not, India was not interested in peace, rather it wanted to implement its conditions. When Pakistan succeeded to reestablish nuclear power, they were back on the track..

I am not saying that every one should seek nuclear power, but I am saying that balance is much more helpful than one-sided power.


Balance means stability

[hammerguy]

for god's sake, iran is far ten years of producing a nuc, and the americans
knows it. All this attack on iran is because they don't want them to have any
advanced technologie, even the peaceful one. they want israel to be the only country in the region who owns it. as for najjad's says, it meaningless, it's just psychological war on israel.

[WiseCookie]

Originally Posted by Rami FPM

Why USA, Israel and these countries have the right and Iran doesn't?...

Because they're not america's allies