Hezbollah flag

[lara]

Originally Posted by Patriotic

It is not because they wrote Islamic Revolution, but because they wrote "IN LEBANON" and not "Lebanese" and that means that they are a foreing side, that have a branch in Lebanon, and there are too many branches in too many other countries.

i will tell you one thing : Stop playing on words coz u will never find a single proof to prove that hizbollah is not a lebanese party and u will never find a proof that HA want "islamic republic" . and its natural to wrote:"al mokawama el islameya fe lobnan" eno what they should write : " al mokawama el islamye fe serelanka" ??!! so plz stop playing on words coz its a very stupid and loser game .

As for the Islam and for the Shiia, we all know that the Shiaa does not believe in Sunnist - and vice-versa - as muslims.

you proved to me by this sentence that u dont know anything about islam and u dont know anything about sunnis and shiites .

regards

[getryne]

1st of all, when foreigns introduce 7ezbullah they say " 7EZBULLAH FI LUBNAN" bcz there's many other HA in many countries, some of foreign HA r sunna, others r shi3a, some r salafiyyin nd Qa3ida.... should they call it " 7EZBULLAH AL LUBNANI" or " al 7IZB AL 2ILAHI AL LUBNANI", second of all,patriotic, i think u dont have that knowledge concerning shi3a nd sunna , both beleive in each other, both have the same Qur'an , sama sala. the shi3a byiftaro on ramadan after 5 min from the sunna (what a huge difference!!!!!)The problem that began from about 1400 yrs was just a political problem, problem about who will lead? or AL KHILAFA.... watever it's called al moqawama allubnaniyya, al muqawama al 2islamiyya, fi aw b 2alb lubnan, same people, same mabda2, same martyrs, same 7ezbullah which the MIRCAVA KNOWS ..................

[sciencedoor]

in brief, cuz i dont want to lose my time with this kind of people cuz they dont understand or dont want to understand.
10x for lara but take an advice they knew the truth and want to disturb it cuz they know very well if islamic thought spread they cant stand against it. their role is to fight it from source.
well 10x getryne for info cuz this is the truth.
Go play another game
CuZ
Game Over

[*Bilal*]

Originally Posted by Patriotic

1- Hezbollah is against the Taef Accord, and they do no believe in it (eventhough nowadays they are asking for it)



2- If really this flag was used before the 1990, then why it is published all over the websites, while we know that before 1990, "google search" was not created yet, and this means that this flag has been used after the 1990, for not saying, it is been used till these days.

First: dont say hek ino hezbollah is against altaef prove it we need facts....
Second: ya3ne walla i donno what is the difference a flag can make in the party ( what a big deal ). Get me into your point.......

[Patriotic]

i will tell you one thing : Stop playing on words coz u will never find a single proof to prove that hizbollah is not a lebanese party and u will never find a proof that HA want "islamic republic" . and its natural to wrote:"al mokawama el islameya fe lobnan" eno what they should write : " al mokawama el islamye fe serelanka" ??!! so plz stop playing on words coz its a very stupid and loser game .

Do you really think that i am playing on words??? What does the ISLAMIC REVOLUTION IN LEBANON means???
As for the prove that Hezbollah is not Lebanese, simply by checking their flag and their UMAH war.
As for what they should write, it is so simple, AL MOUKAWAMA AL ISLAMIYA AL LOUBNANIYA.

Because, IN Lebanon, we have the US Ambassy IN Lebanon, we have the Srilankan Ambassy IN Lebanon, we have McDonnald's branches IN Lebanon, we have Hyunday company IN Lebanon, we have The AUB and those all are foreigns ambassies, universities and companies, while we have THE LEBANESE UNIVERSITY, we have the Lebanaise Des Jeux, and many other LEBANESE companies.
So simple, Hizbollah is a representative of a FOREIGN party/militia/site IN Lebanon.
Maybe he is the representative of GOD on earth, but on both sides, he is coming from the outside of our borders.

you proved to me by this sentence that u dont know anything about islam and u dont know anything about sunnis and shiites .

Well, what do you want to know about the Sunnis and the Shiistes, and about their conflit that belongs to 1400 years before today??

[Patriotic]

Originally Posted by *Bilal*

First: dont say hek ino hezbollah is against altaef prove it we need facts....

Originally Posted by *Bilal*

Second: ya3ne walla i donno what is the difference a flag can make in the party ( what a big deal ). Get me into your point.......

1) Maybe i was wrong, and you are right, Hezbollah was never against the Taef Accord. I'm sorry for saying that, but the newspapers are not :

حزب الله : سنمزق اتفاق الطائف ( 13\10\1989)

حزب الله : الطائف استسلام للمارونية السياسية واسرائيل (12\11\1989)

2) As for the flag, my dear, we all know that a flag is a piece of woven cloth, often flown from a pole or mast, generally used symbolically for signalling or identification. And you are asking that is the relation between the flag and its party



3) And as for the identity of Hezbollah, the simplest prove that Hezbollah is not Lebanese is:

30/06/1989 حزب الله يعلن الولاء المطلق لآية الله السيد علي خامنئي

[lara]

ok Patriotic , u always accuse us that we are iranians and syrians , ill tell u one thing , its right that Iran and syria are our allies but at least we never asked Iran or syria to make war agianst anyone of your parties , while your leaders asked israel to attack hizbollah and lebanon and shiita coz they wanted to get rid from Hizbollah , but they failed and they will always fail .
and all your proofs will always fail coz Hizbollah is lebanese and the big proof that they defend lebanon and they liberated "south lebanon" , they didn't liberated "Jolan" or "tahran" so this proof is stronger than all your proofs coz it represent a real action , while all your proofs just representing words and playing on words

regards

[lara]

حزب الله : سنمزق اتفاق الطائف ( 13\10\1989)

حزب الله : الطائف استسلام للمارونية السياسية واسرائيل (12\11\1989)

thats not a proof my dear coz when u copy paste something u should write down the source of your informations

and im sure that (if there is a source for your info) it will be from israeli-american media

regards

[lara]

3) And as for the identity of Hezbollah, the simplest prove that Hezbollah is not Lebanese is:

30/06/1989 حزب الله يعلن الولاء المطلق لآية الله السيد علي خامنئي

again whats the source of your informations plz ? we need all the link , not only one sentence

ohhh i just pay attention for the date , its in 1989 plz dear bring for us something new , rje3na la osas el civil war , if u want to open ur files we will bring for you a lot of things about your bloody-israeli History .

[Patriotic]

Originally Posted by lara

ok Patriotic , u always accuse us that we are iranians and syrians , ill tell u one thing , its right that Iran and syria are our allies but at least we never asked Iran or syria to make war agianst anyone of your parties , while your leaders asked israel to attack hizbollah and lebanon and shiita coz they wanted to get rid from Hizbollah , but they failed and they will always fail .
and all your proofs will always fail coz Hizbollah is lebanese and the big proof that they defend lebanon and they liberated "south lebanon" , they didn't liberated "Jolan" or "tahran" so this proof is stronger than all your proofs coz it represent a real action , while all your proofs just representing words and playing on words

regards

First of all, i would like to know who did you mean by saying "while your leaders asked israel to attack hizbollah???"
Let me tell you something, so it could be clear for you for the future, i do not have any leader!! I am the leader of myself!!!

As for my proves, it is for you that i posted them, i posted them for the members of the forum that does not know anything about Hezbollah (and you are one of them, especially in the second part of my reply)
As for the Liberation of the South, please can you remember me when was the South Liberated??? Do you really believe that in the year 2000 Israel withdrawled form Lebanon??? What about the cities that its army remains there? How do you call Liberation when the Army is still occupying our land??? Otherwise, there is nothing called Liberation, especially that we remember that Israel did not enter any other mile from the year 2000, they remained in their place where they occupied Lebanon, and this war was the biggest proof that in the year 2000 nothing happens, and by its turn, it proved that Hezbollah is lying, the first time could be when he said that he Liberated the south in the year 2000, or this time, in the last war, by saying that Israel is occupying our land.

As for the Jolan and Tahran, we all know that Tahran is not occupied, so that's why Hezbollah is still sitting in Lebanon. And as for the Jolan, Syrian army is not fighting the occupation, so normally Hezbollah will not, but be sure that as soon as the Syrian army think about liberating the Jolan, the first rockets will be thrown by Hezbollah, and the war will be re-transferred like usual to our land, killing our citizens, destroying our houses.